Unnecessary Pap Smears Discussion Forum

This post has been created to provide an additional forum for discussion, and is a continuation of the old Blogcritics’ Unnecessary Pap Smears discussion.  The original Blogcritics Unnecessary Pap Smears discussion had more than 10,000 comments, but the comments were deleted following changes to the Blogcritics’ site.

Fortunately, the comments from Blogcritics have since been recovered and are preserved here: http://unnecessarypapsmears.wordpress.com/2013/07/12/over-10000-lost-comments-on-unnecessary-pap-smears-find-a-home/   This post also provides a ‘part three’ continuation of the ‘part two’ discussion forum that exists on this site: https://forwomenseyesonly.com/2013/09/22/discussion-forum/

Thank you Alex for suggesting the addition of an open forum devoted to discussion on this blog.


  1. Elizabeth, since this woman is an American and over 75, it probably means she has decent health insurance coverage through Medicare and a supplemental plan, and doctors know this. Besides the intrinsic need to keep woman controlled and in fear of their own bodies, it’s all about the $$$$.

    • Fear of their own bodies sums it up so well.

      The amount of women on social media banging on about smears being ‘imperative for your well being’ and other such cliche nonsense. Many really do believe their cervix is a ticking time bomb.

  2. The UK breast screening scandal seems to have gone very quiet. The impromptu helpline took 14,000 calls in the first week. I wonder how many calls it’s taking now? The charities are bleating for more money and expansion of the programme, saying that the mammography service will be overwhelmed by these hundreds of thousands who weren’t offered a final scan. The tabloid newspapers are full of what a great catastrophe it is. Although the apology letters are going out, it will be interesting to see how many take up the offer. The women concerned are aged 70-79. The letters will offer a scan but also make clear that there is little to be gained from a mammogram at this age. It will be interesting to see just how “overwhelmed” the screening services are over the summer.

  3. UK ladies. Today’s daily fail. Capita told 87 women they no longer needed smears and “invitations” to 1,963 women were delayed in August 2016. Even the daily fail admits no one was harmed or killed by this but it’s the usual smears SAVE lives it’s awful outcry….

    • I commented on it….couldn’t help myself

      An American woman was on there very upset women in the UK aren’t having annual smears and mammograms. Honestly, some people lap up that Kool Aid.

      • Americans are brainwashed that Western medicine is best. People do not ask and challenge. This is why Dr’s here get away with being assholes to patients and their families.

    • Seems nothing but these screening “blunders” in the news. I don’t get it why it’s all happening this month. Hunt wants to privatise the NHS, and I can see why he’s bashing it, but these screening services have been largely outsourced to private running already, and here’s Hunt and the Daily Fail, saying how shambolic it all is. Is it to trigger a national
      enquiry into screening that might drastically reduce it?
      I’ll be intrigued to see just how many women in their 70s turn up to the offer of an extra mammogram. It is already clear in the leaflet that women over 70 can request a mammogram every 3 years if they wish. How many do? There can’t be that many or they wouldn’t have had to introduce the AgeX trial in extending the screening age to 73 – plenty of women would have been going anyway. Awful hysterical article in the Daily Telegraph recently with Breast Cancer Now charity saying that the missed 70 year olds will overwhelm the system, and that it must be hugely extended immediately. Seeing as these women could have picked up the phone and made an appointment anytime, I don’t see that there’s going to be massive demand for the service somehow. We’ll wait and see. Would be so funny if all the letters go out and nobody wants one.

  4. Hi everyone.
    I’ve been a long time reader here, and I was hoping some of you could give me some advice and support. I’ve been trying for a few months now to get on a hormonal birth control pill to stop my periods, they have become less of a natural cycle and more of a chronic illness for me, I bleed so much I become anemic, my cramps are so bad that it hurts to breathe and I can’t get out of bed, I get such bad migraines I wear sunglasses inside, I can eat nothing but plain crackers and chicken broth for a week out of every month. It’s crippling.
    The problem is I cannot find a doctor anywhere who doesn’t require a pap smear and pelvic exam before they will even consider giving me the pill, I have talked with my state health department (I live in the USA) planned parenthood, every general practitioner and gynecologist, and midwife I can find. I even called a website called “project ruby” that promises safe and easy access to birth control, and I was told by their reprsative on the phone that I would have to have a video consult with their doctor to find out for sure, but it is possible and likely I would be denied eventually if not right away if I don’t ever have a pap smear and pelvic exam.
    I’ve already been raped by a doctor doing a so called pelvic exam, which I have been diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder from, and I suspect that I have vaginismus as I have been unable to use tampons since. I would rather die than ever let someone violate me like that again, and if I have to continue to live like this to avoid it I will.
    I honestly live every day of my life in fear of the day some other doctor will try to rape me again, because its treated as an inevitably that it will happen evetuanlly, I have no one in my life who understands this, my own family has called me stupid for this, I regularly cry myself to sleep because of this.
    I’m only 21, and I’ve lived this way since my rape at 16, I am miserable and no one will help.
    Does anyone here know where I could turn for birth control?
    Thank you all for standing up for women like me, not many people do, and even if I don’t actually know any of you I have so much respect for you all, and I’m deeply grateful for just knowing that someone out there understands.

    • Firstly, Welcome to FWEO Myke and sorry you now have PTDS.
      No you do not have to have any exam for birth control, it is a complete try on and makes them more money and increases their figures for targets! This is your body & your decision. No-one can force this upon you….ever! I would suggest that anyone telling you different is reported immediately or at least threaten them with this…..see how quickly you will get your pills after that threat! All this crap about “required” “have to have” “should have” “must have” it is all nonsence!
      We don’t have this in the UK like many countries! Please see this link for USA:
      “Do I need any exam before getting birth control pills?
      You should have pelvic exams and Pap tests based on your age and health history. But you don’t need them just to get a prescription for birth control pills.
      Before you get birth control pills, your doctor should always do a basic medical exam and:
      Check your blood pressure.
      Ask if you’ve ever had blood clots.
      Ask if you smoke.”

      Then this link for the UK:
      “Incidentally, some people still think that you need to have a vaginal examination before going on the Pill. That hasn’t been the case for many years.”

      Wishing you luck and take care.

    • What to the assholes say when you tell them a doctor once raped you? RE vaginismus. A pap is the last thing they should be trying due to the instant spasm you’ll have once the speculum is stabbed inside you. If cold steel even worse response; and I seriously question anything not sealed as these are supposedly sterilized with generic bleach. Yeah.
      I’m not a doctor…but I’ve gotten out of pap scrapes.
      I’ve written substantially about a company called Trovagene here on this site. They once offered a 93% effective urine based hpv test. Pap is 53% accurate.
      I once used Trovagene.
      Now what I’d suggest.
      At your o/v take your husband or a friend. Never go alone.
      Tell them the vaginismus issues you have etc, right to their face. Tell them how you react.
      Now, a pap is useless w/o any Dx of you having hpv or not. If they pap and no dna is done on your sample then you are no better off nor do you know anything more.
      Offer to accept from Dr the cotton swab. This is sterile; and usually goes up inside your endocervical canal. But tell them no speculum or else they’ll pap you anyway and lie about it.
      IF and only if the cotton shows dna do you later consent to having a try at pap. If no hpv then no chance of CC period. Tell them and hold your ground.
      Try to purchase a Delphi Screener at a Canadian, Mexican, or Australian pharmacy. This is an alternative since Trovagene d/c their excellent test.
      Also try to get your hormonal Pill from any of these same pharmacies. If you have a valid Rx for birth control use the number on the bottle as leverage. In Mexico proper they don’t require paps…
      Really lay it on them the BS re pap. If they say it’s regulations, any excuse, demand it in writing. There are protocols, but even these have exceptions. You’ll need to get these from a Dr you already know or the others you don’t know may be suspicious of you.
      If it weren’t for my husband I’d be just like you.
      We despise this useless harmful test.
      Go on youtube to view any gyn procedure you wish to see.
      Love and prayers. We’re sorry.

      • Remind the do-gooder doctors that it takes 10 years average for hpv to develop into anything else. Unless the Dr disturbs the site via scrape as you have only 1 layer of epithelial cells lining your cervix and endocervical canal. If you have virus, these are what gets scraped away and then the virus can implant and thrive as it’s now been put behind your defense network.
        Did you know that some of the swabs used in colposcopy have metal spikes in them? Yeah. Go look.

      • Read the product brochure

        Note it says not to rotate the brush too much as to cause bleeding. How does HPV spread from person to person during sexual activity? If we are told that HPV is spread Through small abrasions in the skin made during sexual acitivities then why is the pap test also spreading hpv around the cervix and into the cervicla canal?

        Note the small print where it says not to use the brush should not be used after 10 weeks of pregnancy. So if a woman shows up and says she thinks she is pregnant and missed maybe one or two cycles but not sure does she get a pap test? If ithe manufactuer recommends that the brush not be used after 10 weeks just exactly what would likely happen if it was used? So what might happen at nine and a half weeks?

      • Usually when I tell them I was raped either I have to follow up with the details to justify it to them and they laugh and say *that wasn’t rape, honey, that was just a pelvic exam* to qoute one doctor exactly. Or they tell me how they’re not a rapsit meanwhile they try and convince me to be raped again.
        It actually isn’t just the pap smear part I’m worried about, I never want a doctor to look, touch, swab, or get near down there EVER again under any circumstances. If I get cervical cancer and die I’d still rather that to allowing myself to be violated again like that.
        I’m also very low risk for HPV because I only had sex one or twice before I was raped which has prevented me from having any kind of a sex life.
        I do usually take my boyfriend or my mom with me anywhere I might encounter a doctor or medical professional, even if I’m not the patient. They’re the only two people who know to handle the anxiety attack and epiosde of dissociation that will follow it.
        Thank you.

    • Hi Mykie,
      I’m also a long time reader here. I was sexually abused long-term at age 7-8 by a paedophile doctor, sometimes in surgical setting. At age 20 pressured into a traumatic pap test, then I developed a phobia with 100% avoidance of doctors. The phobia nearly killed me and took away my option to have children. I finally see some light at the end of the tunnel in my late 30’s. I want to say a few things;

      Trust yourself – don’t let them convince you a pap smear is merely an uncomfortable inconvenience – you will know when you are ready, stand your ground.

      I second cat&mouse and consider taking along an advocate to doctors appointments for you.

      Look after yourself – I know sometimes it’s not easy and sometimes seems impossible, but look after your PTSD, get therapy, try whatever it takes, get your life in order and stable, look after your health/diet, no drugs/alcohol etc. If you are not in a stable situation do whatever you can to get in one. You need a lot of support, foster an environment to make it happen. Think about long-term goals, and working towards being able to have a gyn exam if you eventually, genuinely need one. Yeah pap tests are not necessary, but unfortunately what has happened has happened, and there is a chance that you will need a pelvic exam sometime. You are still young, could be months, years or decades away before/if you need one – who knows if/when – don’t worry and fret about it – don’t pressure yourself – but work towards it slowly and do what you can.

      You need treatment for your PTSD. It can damage your life more than you even realise. Don’t let it control you.

      Take to the doctor any supporting documentation, print it out and highlight bits – eg anything in your jurisdiction guidelines that supports your choice to not have a pap test. Also your PTSD diagnosis and documentation supporting why the pap is impossible for you. Maybe a letter from a therapist. Having things in writing also saves you having to say the whole story over and over if that is difficult for you.

      If you ever go out of town/state, try going to a doctor and saying you forgot your script/pills at home. It worked for me a few times (in Australia).

      Best wishes.

      • Thank you, I have no intention of ever getting a pap smear or pelvic exam ever again.
        I always bring my mom or boyfriend to all my doctors appointments with me, as well a stun gun that looks like a smart phone, police grade pepper spray given to me by my uncle who is a cop, and my boyfriend has a concealed carry permit so as far as self defense goes I’m pretty good on that. But it doesn’t seem any amount of another person advocating for me does much good, one doctor even told my boyfriend *you don’t even have a vagina, you don’t know what you’re talking about* when he tired to explain to them because I was dissociating too much to talk.
        I am in therapy through better help.com which is what works best for me, it’s cheaper, and there’s actually therapists who know how to work with PTSD there while I do not have access to an in person therapist who knows much about it. I have weekly video calls with my therapist and an unlimited texting resource to use as well, and it has helped.
        I was also able to request a female therapist which would have not been possible for an in person therapist.
        I will certainly try to go out of town and lie and see if that will work.

    • I posted earlier about NuRx the only thing I am not sure of is if they limit what kind of pill you can get based on age. (Some of the online companies will only allow Progesterone only pills if you are over 35) I am over 35 and had problems with progesterone only methods (Nexplanon arm implant) and wanted the combined pill so I emailed them to ask but never got a response. Other than that they have great reviews online and I would definitely give them a try!! I wish they had stickers I would go post them on the doors to gynecologists offices lol!

      • Thank you again for posting the information about NuRx. Even with some limitations it may be very helpful to someone. I wasn’t sure if you were originally replying to my post about my doctor’s appt. but I’m actually on blood pressure medication, not birth control (I’m 57!), but during my visit the doctor starting suggesting I should hook up with a gynecologist, etc. Very aggravating. Wish I could get my BP meds online and not have to deal with this!

  5. New trchnlogy for breast cancer detection. http://micrima.com/ Trials are being conducted. The difference between mammogram and this new method is there is no dangerous radiation (xrays) and no compression. A woman would still have to undress and have another person positions them. I was surprised that one article mentioned that 80% of women had dense breast tissue that makes mammograms almost useless.

    The big question would breast screening system be changed or scrapped? Would there br most needless cancer treatments and deaths of women who have slow growing and non life threatening tumours? We cannot see the future; we can only guess from using the past.

    • Interesting. They use radio waves. I suppose it’s better than x-ray exposure but more and more info on the dangers of radio frequencies (i.e., cell phones, Wi-Fi, etc) is starting to emerge. It may not be the “friendly” alternative after all…but it’s a start.

      • Alison uou have a good point. And also if they’re working on a spit test for prostate cancer why can’t they develop a no invasive test for female cancers? Are our bodies really so different and our cancer cells so different from mens?

  6. Just read on news website patients are wary of taking stations once they found out doctors are paid to prescribe them( I didn’t know they were). Article makes no reference to the fact doctors are paid to smear is too and that’s one reason among many we don’t want them..or maybe it doesn’t know..
    Moo I think I read about the new breast test. Don’t you have to undress lay face down with your bombs dangling down a hole into water and the radio or ultra days pulsed through the water?I didn’t know about the sense breast population being so high something else we aren’t told…

    • Yes, they are incentivised to get people on statins. NICE changed the 10-year cardio-vascular risk threshold from 20% to 10% at which GPs would then prescribe interventions such as statins. An article in Pulse said that some GPs leaders were concerned this would “encourage GPs to prescribe statins without discussion around whether patients should be taking them – something that will ‘jeopardise patient choice’.” They also said that some clinicians were concerned that it would “lead to ‘over-medicalisation’ of healthy people and divert GPs’ time and resources away from their unwell patients.” I know this is something Margaret McCartney has spoken about many times. My mum had some blood tests a couple of years ago and the practice nurse told her that her cholesterol was too high and she’d have to go on statins. Mum said she didn’t want to go on medication so the nurse said she’d give her 6 months in order to try and reduce the cholesterol by lifestyle changes but if it hadn’t reduced she’d have to go on them. She’s been to the GPs many times since but they’ve never brought it up again or asked her to have another cholesterol check, which I find strange, so it can’t have been that much of an issue. If Mum had just accepted what the nurse told her without question, she’d probably be taking them now. Another thing they opportunistically ‘tried’ on Mum was the shingles vaccination. She was seeing the practice nurse about some worrying symptoms and she was quite anxious about what might be wrong. The nurse told her she would have to have some blood tests and then promptly asked Mum if she wanted a shingles vaccine. I chipped in immediately and said she’d think about it as I know Mum needs time to think about things and being put on the spot is difficult for her, plus I don’t it was right to bring it up at that time, when Mum was clearly worried about her health. Following that appointment the reception staff phoned her at home to ask her about having the vaccination and then when she went to the surgery to pick up a prescription for my Dad, the reception staff hounded her again and told her that it was important to have it and how terrible shingles is and that they must tell them if she was having the vaccination or not. They provided no information at all about how common the condition is, side effects of the vaccine, etc. I’m sure I researched it online at the time and I think the protection only lasted for a certain period of time (a couple of years?). She said she’d think about it and they haven’t mentioned it since. I know it can be an unpleasant and painful condition but we have a right to make an informed decision.

      • Thanks for the link to the shingles vaccine article, Sue, it’s scary stuff about how it can affect eyesight. The GP reception staff were so pushy, it was two of them onto one, making her feel a silly woman for not immediately signing up for it. I’m pleased she stood her ground.

      • Julie it’s good to hear that your Mum stood her ground. I’ve recently read a very interesting article about osteopenia. Turns out it’s a pre-osteoporosis condition, like pre-diabetes and pre-cancer. No proof at all that you will go on to get the disease itself, but by creating these fake pre-diseases and defining us as ill, drug companies can get everyone onto a lifetime of daily drugs and medical testing.
        Back to your mum’s experience at her local surgery, it seems to be a very common problem that the reception and nursing teams, don’t seem to have any awareness of our human rights and our rights to discuss and make an informed decision about medical treatments, and these arguments often take place in front of a busy waiting room too. The reception staff at my own surgery have frequently been described as rottweilers in NHS reviews, and it has been raised at Patient Participation Group meetings. Under new rules GP practices are obliged to put the details of the PPG in the waiting room so that any patient can contact them and ask the issue to be raised with the practice at the next meeting. Putting your views onto the NHS choices reviews should also get them to sit up and reply publicly. My own surgery never used to reply at all, and the reviews were a torrent of complaints about the service. They were put in special measures and now actually deal with some of the complaints.

      • I was viewing the CDC site on shingles vaccines that just made me somewhat confused. The newer shingles vaccine is more effective. However it wears off.

        As for the eye problems the vaccine can cause, that is probsbly why it is recommended for people over 50 because likely they have eye problems already. If any vaccine caused joint pain and arthritis then it would be recommeded only for the elderly right?

        If the insurance will cover any procedure then for sure a patient will be harrassed to get it. Because it is mostly all about the money.

  7. Turn off your auto correct function.

    I do suspect doctors receive some kick back from over prescribing from some pharmaceutical companies. That is why I often refer to medical doctors as pharmawhores. They also over subscribe diabetes medication, cpap machines and colonoscopies. My current peeve is the “epidemic” of diabetes. Anyone with a A1C over 6.9 is considered diabetic. Over 5 is considered prediabetic and might be medicated. Most older people are going to score higher anyway but see the point of medicating everyone. I have also read that statins can “increase” the risk of diabetes and reducing cholesterol really does not prevent heart disease. Cholesterol is actually a building block of most of the body’s hormones including the stress hormone cortisol. Doesn’t it make sense that a person who is experiencing stress would make mire cortisol and thus need more cholesterol. Also if the body does not get enough cholesterol from diet, the body can make it.

    All the time, the medication usually masks the symptoms and does not address the causes.

  8. An interesting piece of news, I’ve recently found out that the UK NHS is drastically cutting back on its printing of leaflets to save money. As from next March, (2019), they will only print enough leaflets to be sent out with a summons letter. There will be no leaflets available anymore for awareness campaigns, charity stalls, doctors waiting rooms, noticeboards and all the other places we keep seeing this wretched crap. It’s a small step, but it should hit those awful awareness flash mobs pretty hard.

    • The article does not mention two important facts. There are two shingle vaccines. The later developed one is more effective than the older one. The other omission in the article are the symptoms of early shingles. It is an itchy rash, the same looking as chicken pox, usually first appearing on the back just above the hips. It is near the nerves where the virsu hides in dormancy. Usually people ignore it until the get worse with pain in their body. When someone gets the rash they need to get the antiviral quickly because it might reduce the really bad symptoms and pain that can come on. I have not hear abut any adverse effects of the shingles vaccine except for the cost so it might be worth getting.

  9. Horrible story in the news today, male GP filming Pap smears and wasn’t using surgical gloves either, multiple victims aged from 17 up to 60. Thankfully, someone noticed the filming equipment and no gloves and went to the Police. Good idea, go straight to the Police!


    • Thank you for signing. I sign so many petitions mostly relating to the horror that animals go through, but this one caught my eye, disgusting!

  10. Just when you think it can’t get worse. To end screening inequality it’s proposed to send nurses to disabled and bedridden womens houses to do their smears. Email alert from they work for you…

      • Precisely Ada. A 62 year old colleague of mine who just had HIP replacement and her younger sister who has mental health problems are struggling to look after their 80+ year old mother….

      • It’s quite disgusting. I’m sure a smear test is top of their “to do list”. They keep grinding on about tackling inequalities in screening and it’s such utter nonsense. It’s a problem they’ve invented to justify rounding up non-screeners. The truth of the matter is that more and more people are declining to test, and they need to find a politically correct way of rounding up those dropping out of the programme.

  11. Hi linda. Think it’s a uk wide initiative. I agree it’s bloody awful. Anything to boost coverage and the bed bound really are agrwful captive audience..

    • Kat, it’s just shocking. Anybody aged 25-65 who is significantly disabled must be getting regular medical reviews. I’m sure these would have enabled a discussion about whether these women really want this test or not.

  12. Ada i totally agree but the lunacy doesn’t end there. A 2004 document about good practice in ceasing women from cervical screening suggests that even terminally ill women are still entitled to receive their “invitations” and should be treated ” normally” for as long as possible though it does concede it’s up to the woman if she “accepts” her “invitations” !
    Do you think they’d chase her up of she declined or offer a colposcopy if she accepted and showed abnormal cells? Stop the world i wanna get off..

    • Kat, I thought this would make you smile – I’ve seen a lot of women posting about the time taken to return their smear test results, many saying it’s between 6-10 weeks and they can’t understand why the delay, when a quarter of women don’t go, so you’d think they’d be under capacity. It sounds as though they’re really running the service down. I’ve also seen health care people post that they can’t get on the training to become a screener because it only runs once a year. Oh dear! Didn’t think they bothered with training at all, but just rammed it in hard, from my experience. Another colposcopist has posted that referrals are going down and down week after week. Let’s hope she’s out of work soon and they’re all down the Job Centre signing on!

      • Ada I really hope they’re quietly running it down behind our backs. Can’t wait for the hysteria from the screening nazis. .btw any more news on the new data protection laws and it’s relationship with screening? I’m expecting my summons to the one off bowel screening test next year and am considering opting out ahead of time. Anyway there’s no way I’m actually going. ..!

    • https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/patient-confidentiality-in-nhs-population-screening-programmes/nhs-population-screening-confidential-patient-data

      The latest is here. See section 9 for how the GDPR affects screening.

      It certainly sounds as though there is a “behind the scenes” attempt to wind down the services. I had thought myself, when I’ve seen women post that it’s taken weeks to get results, that if they are having a quarter not go, why are they so swamped with the work? Also seen that the options to train new staff are very limited. Same with the breast screening. Huge outcry last month that they’d never be able to fit in all the women who didn’t get their final summons. Really? a) most probably wouldn’t want to go, b) only 72% of routine punters will be taking up the offer anyway. The cervical screening prog is supposed to be transitioning to HPV testing everywhere in UK by end of next year, but they’re keeping it very quiet so far. I doubt very much self-testing will be part of the programme somehow. We don’t have bowel screening here until age 60. I’m expecting a mammo summons this autumn, and am toying with the idea of opting out, but sometimes it’s useful to get the invitation to monitor their approach and check on the wording. I did find out a while ago, that even if you opt out of screening permanently, you are still counted as part of the “eligible population” so we are still part of the ever growing % of non-attenders, and very good it feels to to be part of that group.

    • Terminally ill women??? This makes me want to punch some of these people in the medical profession. Is this still going on, do you know?

  13. HI everyone…I think I might be in trouble and looking for any helpful insight you might have. I missed my period 😦 I’m always super regular, super predictable and should’ve started between the 16-20th. I have some mild period like cramps and backaches but nothing. It feels like ive taken about a thousand pregnancy tests but all of them are completely negative and not even the tiniest hint of a 2nd line

    Hubby and I have been considering trying for a baby because I really do love kids and he wants one sooo bad. I came to the conclusion a couple months ago that i can either do it now while im still younger (28) so that I don’t make it harder on myself by waiting longer or keep delaying until i miss out and regret it forever. sort of a damned if you do, damned if you dont scenario. I’m trying to be brave and go through this trial by fire style.

    Is it possible to just randomly miss a period for no reason? Is it possible to have that many pregnancy tests be false negatives this far in? I’m reluctant to use any herbal remedies to induce a period because if I did conceive I’d like to keep it. I’m also reluctant to go to a Dr because if I’m not pregnant then theyll want to run god only knows what for tests and I just don’t know if I have the fortitude to deal wth that. Any ideas ladies?

    • Emily, yes, it is possible to miss the period or have it suddenly delayed for a few weeks. The list of simple causes is very long: certain foods, activities, climate, changes in life, minor infections like flu, stress… If you are not in abnormally severe pain, feeling ok, and dislike doctors, the best thing at the moment could be just to calm down and wait for a bit more. The more you stress, the more you skew your cycle.
      Regarding trying to concieve, don’t rush unles you are 100% sure that you are 100% ready. 28 years is still very young. These days many women have healthy first babies at 35 and beyond. You are not going to miss anything out any time soon. Also, if/when you are pregnant, you will be subjected to a myryad of invasive tests for months to no end. Every Tom, Dick and Harry will be shoving tools and hads inside you, and you will have no autonomy to stop this process. You have to want the baby badly enough to go through all this. Otherwise it will all become intolerable.

      • Emily I second Fleur. I wasn’t ready for a child until I was in my 30s. My first (and only) child my daughter was born just after my 32nd birthday. Scary I was the oldest mum on the maternity ward..hope all comes good 4u x

      • Very sorry, I down voted your excellent post by mistake, meant to up vote. I don’t have children but have always thought it appalling how many tests and procedures pregnant woman are subject to. It really is like your body doesn’t belong to you anymore.

  14. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/stopped-or-missed-periods/
    Emily, have a read of this link first, but most importantly please do not panic! All women are different and there are a number of reasons why you may have missed a cycle. In my time I have missed many and couldn’t even find a reason why, and I did not feel the need to visit the doctor as often these things resolve itself. Best of luck to you.

  15. Just like the unwanted cervical screening invitations, I have just received – a day after my 60th birthday, an invitation to submit a box of **** for bowel screening.

    Question – do I ring the number on the letter to opt out, having not opted in, or do I let the NHS waste resources sending me letters and boxes every two years?

    • Of all the times you’ve dreamed of sending s**t in the post to some organisation that won’t stop sending you letters, when you get the chance it’s for something like this. I think it’s so bad that they do this on your birthday. Is it really so difficult to get the computer to time this a couple of weeks later? My husband never did his. He was tempted, but too slothful to do it. Why isn’t Jo Waller doing research into why men can’t put intentions into action? Oh but, it’s only women who are so desperate to be screened, that their little brains don’t allow them to take action.

  16. I recently saw about 10 minutes of “The Doctors” (then turned it off) – a US “healthcare” panel of 4 or 5 doctors – they were interviewing a female gynaecologist who had some “amazing preventative health advice”.
    ALL women should take the Pill, (until they reach menopause) whether they need it for birth control or not – it reduces your risk of ovarian cancer by 60%…
    No mention that ovarian cancer is fairly rare, no mention that some women can’t tolerate the Pill or develop health problems/issues as a result of the Pill.
    Now if the Pill is so safe that this advice is a no-brainer, why is the Pill still on script?
    I think this is just another way of filling up waiting rooms and forcing all sorts of unnecessary exams and tests…let’s get all women on the Pill and keep them coming in every 6 mths.
    My female ancestors didn’t take the Pill, they all (but one) lived long and healthy lives.

  17. Also, my female paternal ancestors did not have lots of pregnancies either so would have had regular periods up to menopause.

  18. I started seeing a doctor recently due to elevated BP readings on a home monitor and was reminded today why I avoided them for nearly 20 years. All was well and good through several visits for adjusting my prescription, etc. and I thought he was warm and caring. During today’s visit, he told me I should “hook up with a gynecologist.” I told him I don’t believe I need pap smears as I’ve been married many years and if I caught HPV from someone in 1985, my body likely cleared it long ago. His reply, “the pap smear doesn’t just test for HPV.” I replied, “but isn’t cervical cancer caused by HPV?” His reply, “not always, it looks for precancerous changes and things like that.” Huh? I let it drop because he wasn’t being nasty and I need a primary care doctor for this prescription I’ll be on the rest of my life, and in this screening obsessed culture there are those who would drop me from their patient rolls. So I’m forced to be pragmatic about this, but it feels so dehumanizing, like I’m some silly woman being irresponsible with her health. Sigh. I had hoped the medical community’s attitudes had changed in two decades, but if anything they’re worse.

  19. For the Australians here, you have three months to opt out of the My health record scheme. (If that’s what you choose to do) i’ve opted out, this scheme was originally opt in but they didn’t get the numbers so now it’s opt out, their preferred model.
    There’s a few decent articles online setting out the cons…the only pro may be for those who suffer from serious allergies, but even then, it may be better to wear a medical bracelet.
    I certainly don’t trust the govt with my medical information and find the increasing intrusion into our private business is annoying and concerning…and usually unnecessary!

    • Goodness. So many people spouting the “smear tests save lives” mantra and when you dig into the real story, it’s a load of rubbish.

      I went to leave a comment but there doesn’t seem to be anywhere to do so on this one.

    • Not that these articles provide enough detail, but by the sound of it this woman has been having regular screening – it would have been mentioned if she hadn’t.
      So it would seem that testing did affect her outcome – it failed to detect a problem at an earlier stage, gave her false reassurance, delayed her seeking help when she had symptoms and resulted in radical surgery. How deluded do you have to be to think that such a test is ‘wonderful’ when it fails do live up to its promises? Sheesh.

  20. First thank you so much for this site!!!

    I don’t know if anyone has posted about this before but some gynecologists not only hold birth control hostage but also refuse to remove long term methods like IUDs and implants!! I say this from experience. It took me a year and a half of misery to get my doctor to remove my Nexplanon arm implant and then only because I said I would do it myself if she wouldn’t. Over that time I had to come in for numerous appoints and of course pelvic exams, although they never mentioned when making the appoint that one would be required, only to submit then be gaslighted every time that the implant couldn’t cause any side effects. Just to be clear these were pretty sever side effects (anaphylactic episodes, fainting, hives, stroke like headaches where I couldn’t speak coherently) and I had two other doctors recommend getting it removed to see if it was the culprit. She also said if she removed it she wouldn’t let me go back on the combined pill I was on previously (and had no problems) instead she was pushing for me to get an IUD or tubal. Like I would ever let someone else be in control of my body ever again! At least with a pill I can stop taking it if I have a problem I don’t have to make an appoint and see if the doctor will “allow” me to discontinue it. Gynecology is so oppressive to women and so barbaric.

    Sorry for the rant and thank you to those who read it. Sadly this is not that uncommon of a thing if you look on line. I have read numerous accounts of doctors refusing to remove long acting methods. Again thank you for your site, I found it when I was going through all of that and it was a huge help.

  21. http://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/jul/20/cervical-cancer-testng-drive-will-aim-to-tackle-huge-surge-in-no-shows
    To launch early next year to coincide with the 10 anniversary of Ms Goodys death.. Apparently we are to be called women in the campaign a s opposed to ppl with a cervix. And apparently the made goody effect has worn off so we need reminding again about life saving smears. Obviously the beloved Mr Music is bleating loudly. There’s a new thread about this on Mumsnet which is where I found it

    Also found this….www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3287119-Had-a-reply -from-CRUK-re-cervix-havers
    Outraged feminists and pro screeners withdrawing their charitable donations in protest. It’s brilliant. I’m suffering chronic insomnia atm…these links make it a bit worthwhile lol

    • I really don’t understand why there is always money for an awareness campaign for a cancer that is never out of the news. If you are registered with a GP, you will received an “invitation” every three or five years depending on your age. Women are not responding because they don’t want the screening. It’s not rocket science.

      • I thought uptake rates were the lowest amongst Asian women? Whatever makes them think a vile, gobby racist like Jade Goody, who spewed racist hate against Asians in the Big Brother House, is going to encourage Asian women to go for cervical screening?

  22. Just wondering if Goody’s family have run out of cash and are using this to relaunch her perfume/book/merchandise?
    She was such a hated figure when she was alive. Is her racism and bullying any more acceptable now? I think there is much less sympathy now for her.

      • I wonder how this roll out will get over the sticky issue of consent. I refused permission to be contacted by text or telephone by my surgery. Letters only. I recommend a spam/cold caller number blocking app. Women don’t forget. Women decide what is important and act. Cervical screening isn’t a priority for many women as evidenced by the drop in attendance levels.

      • From the article I assumed PHE were paying for it out of their £4,510,000,000 but I could be mistaken… that’ll pay for a lot of nuisance text messages.

  23. Women rarely forget to do something. If they are not booking appoinments then they dont want one. Why cant they accept this.

  24. I’ve been a long time reader of this forum but never posted. You’re all such inspirations to me. I opted out of paps years ago after getting on the smear/colposcopy (due to inflammation) roundabout I couldn’t get off. After nine more years of negative smears (not one ever showed precancerous cells) I was out. I won’t be having mammograms when I’m 50. The thought of them makes me feel physically sick. I’m also very concerned about the guilt trips women are subjected to who decide against these types of tests.

    Anyway you guys are the best!

    • It’s really nice to know that the posts are being read. Thank you for following and welcome. I only discovered this website by accident when I became ill and Elizabeth found me posting on another website. I’m only sorry I wasn’t aware of it sooner. I’m sure there must be many more women out there keeping under the radar of this whole sorry business.

  25. Hi Jules,
    Welcome to the forum.
    When I read all the horror stories, feel the anxiety coming through…I’m very pleased I’m not on that nasty conveyer belt, pleased you managed to get off it. Even the women who think they were saved, well, it’s clear very few are saved by pap testing…it’s also clear lots end up worse off, previously healthy asymptomatic women. Breast screening, over-diagnosis and over-treatment is a serious issue.

    My advice is to do your reading, if you’ve made an informed decision not to screen, the guilt trips etc. simply don’t work – you know why you passed on the “invitation”…(read summons!) I’ve found GPs usually move on when it become clear you know the evidence.
    I’ve found it’s usually women who haven’t got a clue that get vocal and judgemental, even angry and emotional, the celebrities who promote breast screening just parrot off the party line, that doesn’t respect our right to make an informed decision. Most are well meaning…but honestly, if you’re going to strongly recommend a screening test or pressure/scare women to have screening, at least take the time to look at the evidence, they might choose not to act as ambassadors for these programs, if they opened their minds.

  26. http://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/news/gp-topics/it/cervical-screening-text-message-service-may-boost-uptake-by-25000-claims-nhs-england/20037157.article#.W2CaRTr3Lig.link

    From August they are trialling text messaging to get women to come for cervical screening in London, UK. It will run for a year to see if it increases uptake, if not it will hopefully be dropped. Patients must opt in to get this and cannot be texted just because they have given the surgery their mobile number, but since when has our programme ever abided by the law?

    • It says “saw a 3.7% increase in uptake between patients receiving no text message reminder and those who did.” Wow, a whole 3.7% for all that investment!

      And then the best bit “However the research also saw that a GP endorsement was more effective than a text reminder for increasing uptake.”

      So basically a good ole bit of GP coercion is still the best method of harassing women….

      • Caroline and Ada love your posts, and actually can my last post, I opted out of smears in 2015, signed disclaimer and all. Under data protection laws it’s illegal to harass an opted out woman further about screening. This didn’t stop a certain GP at my practice from continuing to pester me……..

      • Ada mentions that to receive this service, women must opt-in (now that makes a change). The surgery cannot text them just by virtue of having their number on file.

        Also the 3.7% increase only features in the group which consented to being contacted by text?
        If so, then the overall increase must be far lower.

        I can’t see many women consenting to being contacted like this. And those agreeing to it are already probably highly invested in the programme, and just waiting to be called to their next regular appointment.

  27. Ada I don’t think women will be flocking in droves to get this,,…I maybe naive but would data protection laws prevent them just texting everyone.? Though a text would probably be cheaper than all the “invitations “and reminders…..

  28. I’ve read in the research that the only thing that has been proven to increase uptake is to offer self-testing, but they don’t seem to have promoted this in any way at all. Could it be that it really is going to be on offer next year when they roll out our HPV programme, or are they keeping quiet, because they don’t want a load of ladies hanging on until the new test comes out?
    I saw a good article about GPs sending text messages, but can’t find it now. I don’t think it was a great success. You must give consent and opt in to be text messaged. Some surgeries are getting the iPlato App, which you download on your mobile. It is supposed to enable you to book appointments and receive reminders easily.

    • Using a phone text app to book appointments might seem convenient because you don’t have to call and talk to a real person. The problem is when you sign in for that feature you are probably going to have to get all the reminders for vaccines and cancer screenings as well. If you think that going for the phoning in to the receptionist instead to avoid all that is going to be fine, think again. The clinic can just stop having a live person answer the phone and only have voice mail messages taken. They are still going to punch in your name to computer and ask you about the cancer screenings that you have refused every time.

      I can’t see the appointment booking app working too well since some people would be trying to get too many appointments. Imagine you are very sick ine day and there are no appointments available for ten days. This happens to people I know so they just use walk-in clinics when they are sick.

  29. https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(18)30442-3/fulltext?dgcid=raven_jbs_etoc_email
    Whatever possesses women to have these devices fitted after giving birth is beyond me. From my own experience, you are tender and sore as hell down there for weeks afterwards, and don’t get any sleep for months afterwards. Is a “fish hook” up there really what new mothers want? I am amazed that women put up with this sort of harm. I was once on a training course where a woman owned up to having one, and she was met by quite a bit of indignation by the others in the group, I am pleased to say. “Don’t knock it til you’ve tried it”, she kept telling us, but I think we were all glad we hadn’t.

    • Ada I was actually offered one…I declined using the description wire coat hanger. ..my cousin had one fitted around 3 months after having her baby. Problems from day starting with agonising flooding periods. Then constant pain and diagnosis of inflamed tubes. She asked if it could be the coil and told no but by then had enough and insisted it was removed. Doc couldn’t find the strings. Off to hospital to get a scan. It’d moved of course. The straw that broke the camels back was when she was told as it’d moved she could have got pregnant lol….she was panicking shed have to be knocked out and operated on to get it out but her GP went fishing as it were and removed it…all before Christmas too….

      • Kat, I’ve heard of babies being born with the device grown into their bodies. Makes me feel quite ill thinking about it. I understand quite a lot of women end up getting it removed. I became quite ill on 2 attempts of using the contraceptive pill, that I was very glad I could stop taking it instantly. I have heard many accounts of people on hormonal implants feeling very depressed but unable to remove them themselves, they are stuck with them.

  30. NHSE held its first stakeholder engagement event with representation from Jo’s Cervical Cancer Trust, Cancer Research UK, the Institute of Biomedical Science and the British Association for Cytology. You can read a summary of the meeting here http://britishcytology.org.uk/go/news~126

    And there you “representation Jo’s CC Trust” what a surprise!

      • Loads of women posting in the UK that it is taking 10-16 weeks to get results. Music has issued explanation on Jo’s Tosh that is due to shutting down of old cytology labs (about 50 of them) and reducing them to about 10. About 80% cut in workforce of screening programmes now underway. He has had to explain that takes about 10 years for cervical cancer to develop and that the delays will have no consequence.. He is very worried women will lose confidence in the screening programme and not come back. 😂🤣😂

      • With the latest KPI data you linked to recently, I noticed that both cervical (under 50s) and breast screening are running at under the 70% minimum viability thresholds for the UK screening programmes. It’s only the over 50’s who are boosting the figure over 70% because there’s about 75% take up of the last 3 tests in the screening programme. The figures can only go down. There is nothing they can do, but bring in self-testing to boost them.

  31. https://patient.info/forums/discuss/abnormal-pap-smear-675851?page=0&utm_source=forum,sendgrid&utm_campaign=comment-notification,Patient.info&utm_medium=email,email#3325232

    This woman was HPV- about 4 years ago – not sure of her age, but the odds are that she’s still HPV- like the vast majority of women over 30. (about 95% will be HPV-) Even a majority of women under 30 will be HPV- (about 60%)
    This woman is obviously fed up with abnormal Pap tests, she wants the abnormal cells burnt off and even mentioned getting rid of her cervix!
    I tried to explain she needs to find out her current HPV status before she allows any sort of treatment – if she’s HPV- she can forget about “abnormal” Pap tests etc.
    If she’s menopausal or post menopausal – abnormal Pap tests are common, picking up normal changes in the cervix – as we all know, lots of things can cause an abnormal smear – inflammation, infection, trauma, hormonal changes etc. etc.
    Some of you might like to respond to her comment…

    In countries that don’t do HPV primary testing, I assume they’re still doing treatments on women without checking their HPV status first or at least not mentioning this to women and it’s significance.
    I read an article here that said they assumed the abnormal smear was a result of HPV so the treatment was carried out, (usually for CIN 2 and 3) THEN the woman was checked for HPV, so used as a test of cure – if she was HPV- …then the treatment had worked – how convenient!
    I’ll bet most of these women were HPV- to start with…
    The doctors would know they were doing lots of unnecessary and easily avoidable treatments but by not testing for HPV first, they could carry on regardless, horribly misleading and mistreating women in the process. It’s shocking that so many women are still worrying about Pap tests, abnormal results and treatments when they’re not even at risk of cc!

  32. Ugh, just when I thought things couldn’t get any worse.
    A bit random, this, but I thought I’d mention it. That good ol’ screening zealot, Sasieni, reposted a link on twitter to a BBC feature. Apparently some boffin has invented a ‘magic sponge’ to check for esophageal ‘pre-cancerous’ cells. After all these years, they’ve only just hit upon the idea of using cytology for something other than a women’s cervix? Call me suspicious, but since the cytology labs are losing business due to the move to HPV testing, this could just be a desperate ploy to keep the cytologists in their cushy jobs. Doesn’t do the cancer charities any harm to recruit more ‘survivors’, either.
    Any thoughts?

    P.S. I skimmed over the article about bowel screening participation being low – seriously, when is the media going to realise that the ‘studies’ and ‘research’ carried out by the pro-screeners are works of fiction? I can understand some finding the turd test repulsive, but if you really want to be tested then I’m sure you’ll pluck up the courage to do it. However, saying people find it ’embarrassing’ and ‘taboo’.. WFT? Something you can do in the privacy of your own bathroom, no-one else has to know… how is that embarrassing?
    It really does seem like almost every article written about screening designed to make non-screeners look foolish.

    • Yes I completely, it’s all about making non-screeners look silly, foolish and weak.

      The other one that gets wheeled out for smears is women being ‘too busy’ or can’t get an appointment at a time that suits them. I don’t know about you but if I want to do something I make the time and find a way. I struggle to believe anyone’s job is that oppressive they cannot attend a medical appointment, ever. People don’t want the earache of saying no thank you so they make some bland excuse.

      And if I had a penny for every patronizing “reward yourself with a piece of cake and a hot chocolate after your smear” I’d be a very rich woman. All about making you look like a silly girl. Yuck.

      • Caroline, I’m also baffled by those who say they can’t get an appointment. Nearly all the GP surgeries in our area have one evening where they open late, or very early, and in the past 2 years they have been merging into area groups to offer services on different days, so if you don’t like your surgery you can go to a neighbouring one which opens at a different time. At a hospital appointment a few years ago, I told a nurse that my GP was a sadistic bully who hurt women, and she told me that anyone who doesn’t want to attend their own doctors could use the hospital clinic one and have a smear done “more professionally”. I told her nothing would ever make me get another smear test.

      • Ada, very good point and I’ve just seen a load of NHS trusts in London actively promoting their longer hours etc on social media specifically targeting those “needing” a smear test.

        I’m pretty sure it’s another excuse, easier than just saying no thank you.

  33. Off topic but I have just read online Hull UK has a very high rate of HPV infections found by the smear test and a lot of women are leaving their partners mistakenly believing they’ve been unfaithful. ..this comes from a locally bases colposcopist!

    • Thanks katrehman Took me ages to find it LOL & not open for comments I see!

      This part doesn’t surprise me! 2860 appointments she has a year!, all put through this unnecessarily! When are all these women going to wake up to this crappy test!
      “She sees around 55 women at her six clinics held at Hull Women and Children’s Hospital every week” She said: “It’s very rare that I see women with cervical cancer and what I would say to women is this is all about health prevention.”

      Also the most frequent question she is asked is….what is a colposcopy! This does not sound like any of them have submitted to the test with informed consent, clearly they are uninformed of the whole programme & what it entails on the “Crappy Pappy Train” journey!

      • It’s interesting that women don’t appear to have the opportunity to go away and think about any “treatment” they may need. It’s in the stirrups and out with the Bunsen burner before you have a chance to say no.

      • Yes, instead of while you’re here we’ll do it now, they shoild be explaining that there’s an 80% chance this will clear up by itself and you have a choice, but that is never explained.
        They bemoan the fact that women are so misinformed about the test, when the misinformation has been an integral part of the programme itself to achieve high uptake targets.

    • This whole scenario does sound fishy, even for the pap test program. Besides the obvious lack of informed consent prior to “treatment,” shouldn’t abnormal appearing tissue be confirmed in a lab as being precancerous? And why on earth is a “nurse colposcopist” basically performing surgery on these women? Shouldn’t that be done by a physician? The only redeeming thing I can see here is that at least she gives a local anesthetic before hacking off pieces of her patients’ cervixes, usually they don’t even do that.

      • ‘Precancer’ is a nonsense word anyway. Something the medical profession made up to hide their ignorance and scare women into compliance. We know full well than most of these changes wouldn’t progress to cancer, and thus are not ‘precancerous’.
        Frankly, when you look at the big picture, it’s obvious that most of these experts know precious little about the female body and are just guessing. Whether it’s a nurse colposcopist or a physician, they’re all trained to think the same way – ‘if in doubt, cut it out’.
        The reason they like to ‘treat first, and ask questions later’, and have nurse colposcopists instead of physicians, is because it’s supposed to be cheaper. The NHS is funded by our taxes and needs to keep costs down. The people in charge of the funds seem to have a poor grasp of what’s cost-effective and what’s not, and usually make the situation worse. More medicine is not better medicine.
        The system is struggling to survive, people are having operations cancelled left right and centre, dying through lack of care, yet they’re still pumping huge resources into ‘preventative’ measures which are the very opposite of cost effective. For every life saved another life is lost due to lack of resources. Not to mention the poor buggers whose quality of life is poorer due to worthless medical interference.

      • Yes, ‘precancer, is definitely a BS word designed to inflame and frighten women into the system of aggressive medical care, and I use the word ‘care’ loosely. Our insurance based system in the US mirrors the NHS in the constant push for screening tests and their accompanying false positives and over diagnosis, while those truly in need of care go without.

      • Judy, the NHS is creating a lot of roles for nurses that were previously done by physicians to drive down costs. Whilst they may be just as skilled at shoving in a speculum, I do not think they have the background knowledge to fully answer women’s concerns about the test, and this creates a barrier to women getting better information about screening. In nursing screening guidance I’ve read through, informed choice and a woman’s request to be removed from screening does not feature in any of the literature, because this request seems to be an issue for discussion only with a doctor and not considered a nurse’s role. I think many nurses are completely in the dark about declining, opting out, and consequently they don’t know it exists. Only the doctor can have this discussion with you. It’s all carefully constructed to make sure that those having further questions/doubts don’t come into contact with anyone who is knowledgeable enough to know the evidence. As well as pap smear tests these nurses usually undertake childhood immunisations, wound dressing, ear syringing. I don’t think their knowledge about screening risks is too great, and professionalism is sometimes lacking. It’s very much on the hairdresser chit-chat level.

  34. Has anyone seen this today? Cervical cancer: Australia ‘to be first to eliminate disease’

    The headline is a bit silly as they follow with “could be eradicated” so no guarantees here!
    Also they say “It is predicted to be classified as a “rare cancer” in Australia by 2022″ but it was always rare! An ok explanation of HPV I thought.
    All guess work and predictions……….maybe I’ll just check my Crystal Ball instead LOL

  35. As usual our beloved daily fail has jumped on the bandwagon to tell us this and a separate article bemoaning the fact women are put off atending smears by the long wait for results yawn…

  36. Oh here we go again…..Coronation Street Sinead suspected cervical cancer at the age of 24!! Everyone is now jumping on the band wagon to lower the age again! And no doubt this will encourage women (the defaulters) to come forward like good little girls for screening, increasing uptake as they are so desperate to keep it going!

    Coronation Street: Fans demand HUGE Government action amid pregnant Sinead Tinker’s cervical cancer scare as they call for smear test age to be lowered
    soap fans take to Twitter in a frenzy and demand the government, and policy advisers, take note.

  37. I forgot to add that not only is the character only 24, she also has had bleeding for 4 WEEKS which clearly requires diagnostics NOT screening, we all know screening is for women with no symptoms. But that won’t stop all these uninformed twats trying to get the age lowered / increase uptake!

    • I never watch this programme but I was pleased to see that quite a few of these idiot chavs were saying it was irresponsible scaremongering. Women were posting that it really doesn’t happen like this, and complaining about the script. It was good to see that at long last even the diehards are starting to see this propaganda for the vomit that it is.

    • And I do recall that the writers were roundly criticized by the experts over that garbage. Maybe get your facts right before you embark on those sensationalist storylines, guys?

  38. A few weeks ago, I had a torn/strained muscle injury and, over the weekend, visited an urgent care center affiliated with one of our local hospitals. Each of the local hospitals has these type of facilities all over the city. I had to fill out the usual forms, get weighed and have my blood pressure taken.

    Nothing was said by the Dr on duty or any of the staff about screening tests, but yesterday in the mail, I received a postcard from that hospital group about screenings and to “call today to book your appointment!” It was one of those advertising/promotional type of postcards. I don’t know why, but it has me upset and bothered. This is a particularly difficult time of year for me, as my mother passed away from brain cancer 11 years ago in November. Anything that reminds me of that is quite distressing.

    I’ve never received any sort of mailing like that before from that hospital group and am assuming that since I went to one of their urgent care facilities recently that my name and address were entered into some sort of database from which they retrieve addresses and send people these unsolicited postcards. That is very wrong, in my opinion.

    • Hi Susanne
      As you know, health care in the US has largely been taken over by these large hospital systems. They are big business, and are more about making money than about providing healthcare, in my opinion. Sending out these postcards is their way of trying to get you to have cancer screenings in their facility. That way they can bill your insurance for them and take in lots of $$$ to pay their oftentimes thousands of employees and also make a profit. That’s no excuse, of course, but as women we not only give up our bodily autonomy, we give up our privacy and civil liberties as well. I’m very sorry about your mother. I lost my mother to cancer also and know how emotional it feels when those anniversaries roll around.

  39. Daily fail again today ladies.. Aussie woman dying of CC even though she attended all her smears. She’s so proud soon due to vaccine and smears that no other woman will go through she is…even though stat said 269 women died of CC IN 2016..
    it’s hardly rampant

  40. Article states she was diagnosed after her coil was removed covered in tumour and she’d been to all her 2 yearly smears..”the amount required for all women”…

    • It sounds to me that they are attempting to bash the new programme in Australia and say it’s unsafe. I haven’t seen the article, but it’s odd that if it was growing around her coil it must be inside the womb and not on her cervix. Sounds like it has been pushed in there when the coil was inserted and cancer spread up there. I’m amazed at hearing what some women put themselves through. They have treatment after treatment to fix the harm previous “treatments” have done to them. I simply cannot understand why these women can’t see the harm these gyne visits are doing to them, but they are completely brainwashed by the system.

  41. Also daily fail just now Emma myk Mathuna one of the Irish women caught up in the cervical screening failings has died aged 37. That’s their 5th story on CC in a week if you count the story on Snead from Corrie

    • There’s definitely something very strange about what happened in Ireland. This lady has 5 children and the last one only 2 years ago, and it’s odd that nobody knew/saw she had cervical cancer in all this time?

  42. There’s been media coverage of some research showing a lot of pregnancies in Australia are unplanned, and that most women were not using contraception at the time. So the recommendation is to talk about contraception post abortion and post natal – and look at long term methods, like the IUD. Some suggest young women can’t afford the expense of an IUD insertion using a specialist – most/many GPs don’t do IUD insertions. (I know the practice I use refers patients for IUDs but I’ve been told by two of the GPs that most women don’t want an IUD)
    It’s incredible how deaf the medical profession chooses to be, they’ve never listened to women, how we feel is completely irrelevant, lots of women hate the idea of an IUD and don’t want one! I would never have considered an IUD, end of story. A doctor who keeps pushing IUDs when the woman doesn’t want to use that method is out of line.
    “Women are still thinking of the old IUDs” etc. etc.

    Such hypocrites too, women here have always had barriers placed around the Pill, even now it remains on script – every time there’s talk of freeing up access, the AMA and others come out bleating about women “missing their cervical screening & breast checks” and anything else they decide to tack on….it’s transparently about maintaining control over women and the Pill – protecting that business.
    Cancer screening should never have been linked to the Pill and breast checks haven’t been recommended for many years – of course, they know that, but anything goes when it comes to maintaining their control over women.

    • More than 40% of women have contraception failures? I can’t believe it’s that high. Sounds like they’re pushing IUDs on everyone. After giving birth, just the idea of anybody poking anything into your womb is as welcome as a needle in the eye. Just can’t imagine how painful it must be, and they have a high expulsion rate too. I’ve seen a lot of women post about how painful the insertion process is, and how painful it can be for some, with many asking for it to be removed in the following months. These women call themselves feminists and liberated, but it baffles me how putting up with this sort of torture can be anything remotely liberating.

  43. Just spotted this on facebook. Just as I thought, Virgin would love to take on cervical screening but can’t quite understand why women don’t want to go…

    Women aged 25-35 are invted to share their views about the NHS cervical screening programme in Devizes. Sessions will be light hearted and delivered by 2 female Virgin Care employees. Those who attend will receive a free £20 Love2shop voucher as a thank you for attending this one off informal discussion group, refreshments will be provided.

    Please come along and join us on your lunch break -your feedback will be anonymously used to help shape and improve this service.

    Date: Monday 29th October
    Time: 12.30pm-2pm
    Venue: Community First, Unit C2, Beacon Business Centre, Hopton Park, Devizes, SN10 2EY

    Virgin Care are looking for Wiltshire women who have opted out of the cervical screening service, or have taken part in the programme to share their ideas, thoughts or experiences of cervical screening (smear tests).

    To register interest please email lizzie.henden@virgincare.co.uk for more information.

    or text call: 07976 918750

    Thank you! and please share with your friends and family.

    • They’re hoping people will give reasons such as “difficult to get an appointment”, “don’t have the time”, “I think (fairly enough) it might hurt”…. They’ll get ideas for their marketing to make sure common complaints are brushed aside straight away. If people turned up and gave concerns based on objective facts, they’d find it impossible to work that into their marketing because it would be illegal to ignore or play down. The overtreatment rates are what they are. The miniscule reduction in lifetime CC risk is a fact.

    • I completed the survey and got a response. Did anyone else?

      She promised to include my comments on informed consent, the NHS being dictatorial, false positives and the self-testing kit for HPV.

  44. I just been watching coronation Street. .don’t usually but I’m so tired I’m just vegging. ..Sinead the pregnant CC character has been advised to terminate and have aggressive treatment. …hmm. …
    Ada I was thinking what you said about a government database of British vaginas and…while I’ve been called a conspirasist on other sites just think..maybe govt is researching. Think about the invasive questions asked at a smear. Last period. ..if menopausal. ..Maybe they’re tracking if women are starting it earlier or later…contraception? Is one method more popular? Do you practice safe sex? To predict possible outbreak of STI maybe? Or am I off the wall?

    • I don’t think it’s a conspiracy at all, but all very real. All the data about our smear history is all being used right now for research. Researchers have access to this information to predict disease trends over the years, and the smears taken today are being examined for HPV to detect how well the vaccine is performing and predict future disease trends. That’s why I think they’re desperate for young women to be a part of the programme and not abandon it. The data doesn’t identify name or address, but our medical, smear histories are available to researchers, who can request access through research applications. No-one ever knows that they’ve been a part of this research, because a lot of it is checking past medical data where people don’t need to be identified. I have seen a few research papers confirming that women start their periods earlier today, than they did a few years ago.

      • Hi Kat and Ada.

        When I was having smears I always sensed they were collecting data. I always felt annoyed having to ask these intrusive questions. I was asked about periods and contraception. I’m sure i was once asked about sexual persuasion ie was I hetrosexual but I was never asked any other question about sex. I always wanted to not tell them anything but because my doctor and his PN implied smears were compulsory I thought it was complulsory to answer the questions also.

        No man would endure regular, unwanted, genital examinations followed by barrages of intrusive questions. This simply wouldn’t happen. How is it that this happened to us? We are fundamentally underneath the same human creatures as men. It just shows how clever the authorities were emplying such underhand tactics to get us to comply with all of this.

      • Hi Kat and Ada. I put having to ‘ask’ rather than having to ‘answer.’

        I’m recovering from shingles followed by chest inf. Have been pretty low. On the up now tho.


      • Get well soon, Linda. Definitely think attitudes are changing, or are we just getting older? If I didn’t have my daughter, I might have buried my head in the sand over this, but when I think what happened to me and my “medical care” in the 1990’s, I will do everything I can to make sure it doesn’t happen to her.

    • I’ve always believed that they collect data to monitor sexual activity amongst women.
      Like when there was a study quoted a few years ago suggesting that on average, women had had something like 9 different partners by the time of marriage, as compared to around 2, for the previous decade. So much morbid fascination with women’s private lives in contrast to men’s.

    • Linda, on the subject of the intrusive questions at these exams – I’m a private person and always abhorred the intensely personal questions and found them almost as violating as the exam itself. You’re absolute right that never in a million years would men be subject to such a violation of their privacy. The fact that women are just fits in with the whole mindset in the medical community that our bodies are public property. It makes me livid!

      • What irritates me is that we are expected to be OK about it all. We have various campaigns in the UK (notably the gyne cancer charity The Eve Appeal) which encourage women to shout the word vagina, and talk about vaginas with their family, and on billboards we have flowers in the shape of vaginas and cup cakes in the shape of vaginas. We have knitted and crocheted wombs and vaginas. They want it all paraded everywhere, and tell us we need to get used to this to be liberated. It’s become a coming out experience for women, and a feminist rite of passage. You’re not a liberated woman if you don’t follow this crap and it’s always promoted that all women must want this. It’s about as liberating as page 3 in The Sun.

      • I agree. I remember once, many years ago, when I went to my previous GP about my ear being blocked (it just needed syringing) he started asking probing questions about what contraception I was using, before he even looked in my ear. He then tried to persuade me to book in for a smear test. I was so taken aback that the consultation was suddenly not about what I’d gone in for that, when he asked if he could look in my other ‘good’ ear, I thought “don’t bother”! I couldn’t wait to get out of there and, like a ‘good girl’, I promised to book my ‘smear test’ appointment on the way out, before hurriedly proceeding right past the receptionists!

      • In 2014 I wrote my GP a letter about the time she forced a smear test on me years before and how it had badly affected me. I sent it to our practice manager, because I wanted someone else to be a witness to what this GP was like. She wrote to me to acknowledge my complaint and had passed the letter to Dr X for her to reply. Never had a response. Have now found out that she’s retiring next year. Would be interested to see if the cervical screening rates at this surgery take a tumble, as they have some of the highest rates in our city. The surgery has been in special measures for some time, but has recently improved out of special measures – the CCG congratulated them on the high screening rates, so that got them off the hook.

  45. Oh my days ladies over on cervical health instagram she has a new thread about abnormal cells. I get she’s a blog for women suffering with abnormalities but 79% of them have had them in their smears..and we all know it can go back to normal on other own…

  46. Article today, state opposition (Liberal) will make the Pill available OTC if they win the upcoming election, Labor are considering it as well – you’ll still have to see a doctor for the first script but can then buy it over the counter. Currently, women have to go back to the doctor every 6 or 12 mths and fend off cervical screening, and sometimes even breast and pelvic exams or buy the pill online. Naturally, the AMA is already bleating that it’s a bad idea, lives could be at stake etc. Of course, they mention cervical screening…it should never have been linked to the pill but that’s still the case today…not sure how many doctors would deny women the pill these days if the Pap test is rejected, I imagine quite a few would still mislead women into believing it’s necessary if you’re on the pill and some probably still pressure women, most would strongly recommend it. So getting women into the consult room is incredibly important to protect the screening program…and of course, they want the income from all the consults. The screening program is now 5 yearly from 25 so the govt probably thinks most women will see a doctor at least 5 yearly when they can be “reminded” about screening…and Medicare would not be covering all the unnecessary consults.
    This comes after recent research showing a lot of pregnancies in this country are unplanned, if we cared about that, we’d have freed up the Pill a long time ago, instead of that for many years it was the norm to leave empty handed if you refuses the excess.

    • https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/state-opposition-promises-over-the-counter-contraceptive-pill-20181021-p50b35.html
      From this it looks as though you can only get your first prescription after you’ve had a smear test. A way to get women in for screening I bet. I wonder if the pharmacy will renew the prescription in 5 years time if you have declined to test. Also what happens if you want a break for a baby, and then want to restart the pill at a later date. Presumably, they can withhold it if you don’t get another prescription from GP. I have seen one GP post that women will miss the “added value” of their screenings if this goes OTC. These GPs have a very distorted sense of their own value.

    • I think the pressure today is different. It’s more cautious. They’ve gone from saying “you must have it” to “maybe you should think about booking yourself for a smear test”. It’s slightly more cautious. They must know a lot of women are not just aware of the limitations of the test, a lot of them know what their rights are too. It is no councidence that it is the younger generation spearheading the drive for lower take-up rates.

    • Thanks for that link….all about the dollars! All the more reason for them to get the increases they so desire! Words fail me…but my anger deepens!

  47. Women are clearly wising up to this test and its implications. On the BBC news this morning:
    About three million women across England have not had a smear test for at least three-and-a-half years. Screening rates are at their lowest for two decades. A total of 220,000 British women are diagnosed with cervical abnormalities each year and there were 854 deaths from cervical cancer in England in 2016. The NHS target is for 80% of women aged 25 to 49 to be tested every three years and the same proportion aged 50 to 64 to be screened every five years.

    Note this part – 220,000 put through this crap! And we know most of these would not turn to cc And the mentioned target 80%!! Still putting it down to embarrassment! Usual words “non-attenders”. Comparing it to “going to the dentist or opticians” for goodness sake! Used the name of Jade Goody yet again and another cc victim, although vague about her supposed cc “operations” which were probably just simple abnormalities??
    No doubt the news coverage will encourage more (un-informed women) to the herd of happy pappers! Unless they open their eyes and clock the tiny amount of “854” deaths and decide “I don’t think so Doc”?

    • Good God, I wonder why they’ve suddenly started running this in the news? I thought January and June were their awareness months? Just thinking that the new uptake results for previous year come out about November but not able to see any published figures yet. By the sounds of it it looks like the figures have fallen again. Oh dear.

      • Chas and Ada I loved this. The sun paper is jumping up and down proclaiming so many lives will be lost as women shun smears in their millions….the article mentions my town where take up is 61%. Actually I’m amazed its that high….it’s a deprived area with a high ethnic minority mix of different group the kind NHS bleat it’s hard to reach. Interesting that maybe the earlier settlers took the “crap” jobs their children and subsequent generations flew high and became medics or radiographer ect… Maybe they too are more informed than embarrassed lol…back to the drawing board PHE…

    • Hi, i’ve not had a smear for 11 years and worry constantly that i’m being reckless with my health. You stated that 854 is a tiny amount but it’s still a death. I’ve been looking at statistics for Scotland and there are an average of 45 cases of cc in the under 30’s per year. I’ve read on here that you shouldn’t start testing until 30 year old. Surely that’s a bad idea.

      Sorry if I seem argumentative but I don’t know what to believe, I have health anxiety and I worry constantly about getting cc.

      • Hi Tracey, this is exactly the kind of fear they have instilled in women! Women are not a disease. Our private body parts are NOT a ticking time bomb. Out of that 854 a third of those were MISSED by the screening so clearly it is NOT a good test! They screen approx 4 million women so 854 is not a big number. Also of the 854 how many died BECAUSE of the actual treatment not the cancer i.e. infection due to surgery (Sepsis), chemo (we know that kills), radiation (we know that kills too).
        More people die from falling down the stairs! There are so many other deaths from other illnesses to worry about. Take a look at heart disease for instance: https://heartuk.org.uk/press/press-kit/key-facts-figures
        Coronary Heart Disease remains the number 1 killer in the UK. 160,000 people die from heart and circulatory disease. 73,000 people die from coronary heart disease (CHD). 42,000 people died prematurely from cardiovascular disease (CVD).
        And also here https://www.bhf.org.uk/for-professionals/press-centre/facts-and-figures

        It is time women stopped worrying about cervical cancer OR cervical abnormalities. CIN 1/2/3 is NOT cancer and most will not turn to cancer. Abnormals can be because of bathing products/douching, sexual intercourse, condoms, tampons, simple hormone fluctuations which are normal, but they don’t bother to tell you that. They also include in their figures of diagnosed cc both CIN 2 & 3 so you have become a cancer patient – BUT CIN is NOT Cancer so why should these be added to those statistics?!? Misleading!!
        So basically 220,000 women absolutely panicking thinking they have or may get cc. It messes with our brains, our thinking, we go through all these awful procedures, thinking we are cancer survivors…I wouldn’t be here today if it wasn’t for screening….utter BS I’m afraid! And it turns our world upside down to the extreme!
        Please take a look at the Education page on this site as there are many links with fantastic information.

      • Tracey, we’ve been over this with you many times before. The biggest threat to your health and wellbeing is your health anxiety, not your cervix. Do you worry about other body parts too, or is it just the constant scare stories and media hype that’s made you obsessive about one tiny part of your body? I find it hard to believe that you stopped testing because of the anxiety of waiting for results, yet you’re worrying yourself sick – literally – that you’re being irresponsible by not testing? Hmm.

        Again… when they perform a smear, all they’re doing is scraping some skin cells from the END of the cervix, and checking those cells for signs of change. The skin can easily be irritated or inflamed by a number of things, and anything that looks unhealthy will be labelled a ‘risk’. The fact is, they do not know what cells are ‘pre-cancerous’ and which ones are not, so every little blip is treated as a threat. This leads to vast numbers of women undergoing damaging treatment for something that would never have caused them harm. A ‘smear’ is more likely to cause you distress than give you peace of mind.
        Do yourself a favour and get yourself an HPV home testing kit if you’re so worried. It’s far more accurate than a smear test.

        The type of CC that young women develop grows further inside the cervix – it’s almost impossible to detect genuine ‘pre-cancerous’ cells in the under 30’s with a smear. On the other hand, ‘abnormal’ changes are extremely common. So testing the under 30’s prevents very few cases but leads to huge numbers having surgery which can cause all sorts of problems. It would seem that the rise in cases among young women is this very type which is difficult to detect early.

        The average rate of cervical cancers in Scotland is 13.7 per 100,000. In England it’s 9.1. In the Netherlands, 8.9. Scotland screens every three years and has been screening from age 20 until very recently. England screens from age 25. The Netherlands screens every five years from age thirty. So more screening = fewer cases? Nope.

        I’ll stop now, because I don’t think any of this is going to sink in anyway.

      • Hello Tracey. If I remember rightly, you posted a very similar piece about a year ago. I see that you are still very concerned about your health.

        Assess your own risk by reading as much as you can about the pros and cons of having the test – then decide. None of the women here would deffinitely say not to have one. We can only tell you what we have decided for ourselves. Only you can decide for yourself. It is your choice to have a smear test or not.

        I think you will find that this forum was set up to listen to the feelings of those of us who for one reason or another believe we were forced into having smear tests against our will. We feel we have been coerced, conned and tricked into doing something we would have preferred not to have done. Some of us, me included, have been harmed by having this so called simple test. I am for one am very against it and would not have one. The forum comments are nearly always biased in favour of NOT having them.

        You seem very concerned about your health. Perhaps you could be helped by buying your own HPV kit from an online retailer. This will tell you if you are HPV neg or pos. If you are neg then you can put your mind at rest there is little chance of you getting the type of CC cause by the most prolific HPV virus. If you are HPV pos then you might need to make some hard decisions “FOR YOURSELF” whether to screen or not….

  48. Katreham – thank you I have just looked at the sun article! https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/7561870/cervical-cancer-smear-tests-rates-drop/

    Very similar to the BBC one although the picture of a naked woman with a question mark on her vagina is appalling and was not necessary to include….what a joke! The video also says women SHOULD be tested every 5 years etc. There’s that word again SHOULD!!!
    Then they go on to explain what happens during the test in detail……we know already! And they used Stacey Soloman / Jade Goody / Jeff Brazier / Jessica Knowles here to try to increase the uptake. OMG……..all this makes me so mad! Half way down there’s a pink link https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/1770470/smear-test-nhs-cervical-cancer-hurt-painful/
    “A SMEAR test is something almost every woman in the UK will experience at some point ”
    “How often you need a smear test depends on your age, with every woman over 25 being invited for a screening”

  49. You don’t sound argumentative, just anxious.

    As other posters have mentioned, this is the reaction they want. They being anyone who works with or profits from cervical screening including that very well known charity… People want to keep their jobs at the end of the day. They want you scared and compliant.

    If it helps you rationalise, your lifetime risk of dying in a car accident (+/- 0.42%) is pretty much the same as your lifetime risk of cervical cancer (+/- 0.65%). Do you worry about traveling in cars? Probably not and that’s because you haven’t had a terror campaign rammed down your throat for many years.

    Lung cancer is way more common than cervical cancer but have you been looking out ways to get lung screening? Probably not and that’s because you haven’t had a terror campaign rammed down your throat for many years.

    It’s your choice if you want to screen or not but please remember you have been conditioned to feel this way. Don’t feel bad but just try your best to put it in perspective.

  50. Tracey Caroline is so right! The new changes to the UK system are meant to be beneficial to women. Yet I’ve actually seen a post over on the PHE blog from a worried screener asking about the effects on their jobs.! Yes redundancy is awful…it’s happened to me.. but these are changes meant to benefit us…to help us and they’re more worried for their jobs! We can throw steel workers and BHS staff on the scrap heap in this country no problem but hey let’s keep these screener in work! Sorry..rant over and Kat out lol..

  51. Well ladies I’ve done it now-I’m pregnant!! I use FAM so i know fertile day was October 10 and the first verrry faint line showed at 13dpo on October 23. I’m absolutely thrilled much more than i thought i would be but omg I’m so scared too! Not about the pregnancy I think that’s going fine but all the things Drs will want to do. Hubby is over the moon happy. He’s promised he’ll be with me through everything and won’t let anyone disrespect my wishes. I know it’ll be a while before prenatal appts start and I’m trying not to stress since that’s even worse for me and baby.

    A dear friend (one of my bridesmaids) is a bit like me but to a lesser extent i think. and she absolutely adored her ob. Described her as a calming presence and said she was very mindful that Drs can be stressful. Maybe I’ll call her tomorrow and give her a try.

    I’m so nervous about all of this! Everyone here has always been so knowledgeable and supportive. I hope you won’t mind if ask a ton of questions and maybe even moan and/or rant from time to time!

  52. Thinking the HPV problem is also related to the ridiculous lifestyle of youngsters today, they eat a lot of crap and do not take care of themselves. They like to party late, sleep less and drink excessively, some also smoke!
    There is another link in this article taking you to BBC 3 blog http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcthree/2011/01/60seconds-sam-jaime-winstone-on-the-dangers-of-oral-sex.shtml
    This part stood out, common virus and slim chance of turning to cancer!! Says it all IMO!
    “Well, Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is common. It lives in the skin and can be passed on through sexual contact. Cancer Research UK says there are more than 100 different strains of HPV and most of us are likely to get it at some point in our lives. But there’s no need to panic. Most people won’t get any symptoms and it usually goes away without treatment. So the virus may be common, but the chance of it turning into anything cancerous is slim.”

  53. Morning All, I just came across this that I have never seen before and thought it may interest you:
    A little old but I selected the first Trial (completed) & it states- “Cervical cancer is the most common cancer in women under 35 years and is a major public health concern” UTTER RUBBISH OF COURSE! & the usual ways of intervention to increase uptake…..yawn LOL. And screen figures fell
    In the under 30s London population, average coverage only reached 50% in 2013!
    Year on year the uptake figures decrease. It is interesting to read and worth a quick look.

  54. https://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2018/10/the-ellen-show-broadcasts-potentially-harmful-information-about-ovarian-cancer-screening.html
    They quote (sounds a bit like cervical screening to me):
    Many women report pain from transvaginal ultrasounds.
    Women will be falsely reassured. That is unethical and cruel
    Many women who get these unindicated ultrasounds will have findings that are likely benign, but it will take more (expensive) testing to prove that or even possibly surgery — surgery that would never have been needed if it were not for the unindicated ultrasound.
    And then this part (but it’s ok in cervical screening to use Celebrities):
    Celebrities have great influence on health care decision-making, and they should be mindful of that privilege. Information about ovarian cancer should come from a doctor, not from an actor who plays a doctor on television.
    What a crazy world we live in!

    • http://www.histmodbiomed.org/witsem/vol38.html

      I found this discussion on the history of cervical screening, which has some interesting highlights mainly from page 62 onwards. You can download the full brochure of the meeting. Before that there is a discussion about how the causes for cervical cancer were discovered from about page 30 onwards. Of note is how they managed to photograph cervices in virgins – apparently it was common for virgins to present at hospitals for a “stretch operation” before their wedding night, and the anaesthetised women provided a ready supply for the scientists to build up a collection of photographs of virgin cervices for their research. Another highlight is how the Coronation Street story of Alma scared women witless into screening. The speaker talks of how they’ve tried so hard to convince women that smears are nothing to be afraid of, but that the only thing that boosts attendance is to terrify them into going. How very funny…

  55. https://www.kevinmd.com/blog/2018/10/prostate-cancer-screening-campaigns-are-giving-men-the-finger.html Copied some snippets below that they consider about men’s screening ……….but not with women’s screening i.e. harms/treated unnecessarily/informed decisions etc.

    After years of going through the perfunctory DRE from my own doctor, I finally challenged him about the evidence. That was a couple of years ago. He hasn’t put the glove on to give me the finger ever since.
    Nearly 100%? I recall one observer saying about such a statistic, “Hmmm. Almost as if it’s not a cancer.” Indeed, early detection may mean finding something that would never harm a man in his lifetime but would still end up being treated. detecting many things that won’t cause harm.
    There are benefits—and harms—to screening and men should be helped to make informed decisions that best reflect their values and preferences.” In other words, a fully-informed shared decision making discussion between patient and physician is needed, not a “no excuse” mandate.
    these campaigns do a disservice to uninformed men. It’s an absurd way to conduct an awareness campaign. It may raise awareness of the comical creativity of an advertising agency but does nothing to deliver the facts that men need to make an informed decision.

    This approach and thought is not even considered with women…just suck it up & get used it crap!

    I’ve been on one today people!!

    • Hi Chas. So glad ‘you’re on one.’ The article highlights the differences between how men and women are treated. There are almost no articles about informed decision making for women. This basic human right is not afforded to us. It was never afforded to me.

      In the previous article you posted they state that CC is the most prevalent cancer in under 35 yet they do not go on to admit how rare it actually is. This is a gross exageration of CC rates. I think the statistic is currently 3 in every 100 000 women. They also tell how they are going to start rolling out texting women in the London area. ‘Your cervical screening test is now due’ This is exactly how the ‘invites’ used to be worded. No promotion of choice or pro’s and cons of screening. Just your test is now due end of conversation. It goes to the very fundamentals of lack of respect for women.

      Its not just the UK. Its everywhere. Globally, doctors have colluded with governments to over ride the human rights of women everywhere to ensure that we have this unpleasant examination at all costs. I think America and Canada are worse but in India and China and probably North Korea too its compulsory. Thank God so many women in Britain are waking up and refusing this test. I read in London the rate is now low as 50% .

      If I had had the choice all those years ago I would have refused. That stupid practice nurse who sexually assaulted me and then another time the test caused me to abort my baby. To date no department of the NhS, Conservative government, Healthwatch or PHE has had the good manners to reply to my letters. The collusion to silence women runs deep.

      Eliz posted the other week that medical news today has removed its posts about painful smears. The news really passed us by and none of us made a fuss at the time. It was only the other day when I tried to access the site that it home to me that the Nazis are very much at work trying to control their version of reality. They shut down the site basically because it wasn’t in line with their way of thinking. I wonder how many others are disappearing without us noticing. I also can;t find the one about women complaining about spontaneous abortions after smears. I hope this one never goes.

      And don’t think for one moment PHE and Anne Mackie is on the side of women. She is a pro screening Nazi just like all the others who would like to take freedom of choice away from women. I get that impression from the way she colludes with that other idiot Robert Music.

      The other day on one of the morning programme that doctor Hillary was going on about how it only takes 3 minutes and women should just get on with it. What does a man know?

      I wished, as I was watching it a bunch of us, would storm the studio, hold him down and perform an unwanted genital examination on him for three minutes!!!!

      Personally I have no trust of doctors. Their mind set towards women and choice is rotten to the core. Notice how no doctors ever post here about how sorry they are about the way they have treated women in the past. The silence says it all.

  56. Hi ladies..latest from cervicalhealthhannah Instagram. She links to a BBC radio clip. All women must start taking their smears seriously (really? Why?) ..sorry naughty kat. Anyway she asks how can we encourage women to go? One comment…it’s only5 minutes most women spend longer for g their brows!! Oh really! Just like a smear is just like the Opticians lol…..

    • I had one woman on Twitter saying going for a smear is just like going to the dentist. Errrrrr, not sure what your dentist has been doing but I’m not sure that’s a very sensible comparison LOL

      I’m also sick and tired of this ‘you’ll wax your bikini line but won’t get a smear’ rubbish that gets shared. A wax is something you want to do with a beautician who isn’t an authority figure and who isn’t rooting around in there. It’s not an invasive medical exam you might not actually want but have been bullied into or summoned to. Ultimately it’s about control, you feel in control at a beauty appointment but many women don’t feel in control at a medical appointment. That’s wrong but realistic.

      The comparison is ridiculous! Rant over 🙂

  57. I can only take so much of these “self-styled healthcare advisors” like cervicalscreen1. Have you noticed how on social media they are always egging others on, saying how brave women are to put themselves through testing. Congratulating one another that they have been through this rite of passage to big girliehood. They are terrified women will break ranks and separate from the herd, leaving them to feel that they are the ones left who have to go. The ignorance is deafening. The whole system is constructed to ensure true knowledge and evidence never gets out.
    I viewed a conversation between two nurses recently. They were discussing the lack of training for smear takers. They claimed the theory was good but practical skills lacking. They were being let loose on the British public with little practical skills. I’d always suspected this. When one mentioned this to supervisor, was told to just “Go out and go for it!”. These people really don’t know what they are doing. You cannot discuss anything with them because they know a lot less about it than we do. It is a bastion of ignorance, fear and bullying which keeps it all going, and prevents informed consent from ever coming into play.

  58. Hey ladies, the last smear test I had was 2 years ago when I was 29. It came back as borderline and scared me so much. I then went on to have a the camra looking at the cells and the dr said I had hpv and told me to come back in 6 months which I did. He said it looked better but to come back again in another 6 months and yet again it was still coming back abnormal. I then decided to do some research and came across this site which has helped me so much. I thought it was strange how so many of my friends and relatives have had treatment for abnormal cells as if it was normal. I felt so weird about the whole thing I have decided not to go back and have opted out of the programme. I have days when I worry but am trying to trust in my body!

    • There is a self-testing kit available online (Please google the “Delphi screener”).

      It is generally recommended that women under 30 are not tested for HPV as the virus can be transient in that age group and often disappear by the time women are around that age.

      This is the reason so many women were getting false positive results and receiving treatment that could often cause more harm than good.
      This is the reason the test age was upped to 25.

      Congratulations on finding this site – I hope you will find it helpful.

  59. I suppose I shouldn’t laugh………………but…………I am LOL! Good old Capita aka Crapita!
    More than 40,000 women in England have not received information regarding cervical cancer screening after a failure to send out letters by the NHS
    Dr Richard Vautrey, of the British Medical Association, said the situation was “frankly appalling”.
    “We know that, because of the nature of this procedure, many patients are already reluctant to attend these appointments, and therefore reminder letters are crucial.
    “Incidents like this, therefore, will hardly inspire confidence in the system and risk even fewer women getting checked,” he said.

    Apparently….No harm done – NO….really, oh what a surprise!
    Forgive my sarcasm but I hate all screening now with a passion!

    • What’s frankly appalling is this idiot acknowledging that many women are reluctant to attend because of the nature of this procedure, but not suggesting or offering an alternative that patients are more comfortable with. How about widespread self-testing? But no, then they would lose control of women, and it would put too many in the program out of work. In socialized medicine it’s the program first, women last. In our insurance-based system in the US, it’s the industry first, women last. Notice a common theme here?

      • Hi Judy, it’s common because the UK government wants an exact replica of the US system in the UK. Makes mega bucks, that’s why they want to privatise it so that private companies can run it just like the US. Private companies are taking over “preventive healthcare” like screening because it is so lucrative, and the government is getting companies to take over any bits they can. I think this GP is lashing out because he wants to show how inneffective Capita is and wants a return to state control, at the expense of making women look stupid helpless creatures, of course.

      • I completely agree. He blatantly acknowledges many women don’t want to attend, the sub-text being we hound them with letters until they are screened..

        I just tweeted back at them with this – “many patients are already reluctant to attend these appointments, and therefore reminder letters are crucial.” In other circumstances that’s known as harassment.”

        Harassment is exactly what it is!

      • Wow Ada, that’s interesting. Kind of a fight between public and private healthcare with women being used as pawns. Its ironic that many in the US wish for a national health care program, but our politicians are in the pocket of big insurance companies, so its not likely to happen anytime soon. But this obsession with screening is apparently in both systems, and not likely to subside anytime soon with all the dough-ray-me it brings in. Unfortunately its one of the factors that drives the paternalism in women’s healthcare – got to keep women coming in for these supposedly life-saving screenings, otherwise the gravy train dries up.

      • Yes, that’s it exactly. We have a lot of private companies like Richard Branson’s Virgin Care running sexual health clinics, contraception and the like. I recently posted a survey they were running on why women didn’t go to screening. Obviously to research women’s views on how viable it is as a business if the uptake is falling year on year. Private companies are interested in cherry-picking the non-essentials of healthcare, while the car crash victims and emergency, end-of-life care is still picked up by the NHS.

    • It sounds to me like the breast screening invitation failures a few months back. That ran into thousands, and there was talk of lives cost. A few weeks later they were forced to drastically reduce the figure and a few weeks after that it turned out that there was no error at all, but that the staggered entry age meant some women got their last invitation at 70 and others at 73. Only by then no-one was listening. It sounds to me this is a repeat exercise.

    • Wow that Daily Mail article is unbelievably long but made me laugh at the drama of it all!
      Crapita strikes again! The woman in stirrups….why oh why?


      Reading between the lines obviously very few lives (if any) are at risk here, but I bet it contributes to the many uninformed women panicking and helping to increase the attendance rates! If these women read the article properly there are many points that suggest the test just isn’t worth it looking at the numbers, but no…….they’ll all trot along!

  60. Thanks for the info above about the GDPR rules regarding smear reminder texts. I had one last week only a few weeks after a pill prescription renewal appointment in which I said clearly to be taken OFF the surgery’s reminder list. They have a separate list to the national register.

    I said the overtreatment rates were unacceptable to me, which the nurse didn’t grasp because – in order to convince me it’s worthwhile – she spelled out the conveyor belt you end up on as a good thing. “If this happens you’ll have tests every 6 months to keep an eye on it, and if this happens you’ll go straight to colposcopy and they can remove cells there and then if they see something wrong” – as if abnormal cervical cells are a medical emergency. People wait longer for treatment in A&E compared to women in colposcopy who are offered removal hours after their initial appointment. I have no idea how that’s ethical. People need a reasonable amount of time to make a decision about non-emergency care.

    • I’ve had a look at stuff for nurse training in smears, and they don’t appear to have training in what the harms are, answering questions from concerned patients or opting out of the programme. It’s not within their remit to do so, and yet they are often the only personnel a woman is likely to meet. All part of the plan to ensure that the only person who you can speak to, is not the person who can carry out your wishes to remove you from call up. I keep seeing special clinics being run here and there, asking women to come in and just have a chat about screening if they are not sure, and that you are under no obligation to have the test, but you can be certain that there won’t be anyone available who can have that discussion you want to remove your name from the recall list.

      • adawells – I agree there as I have looked at the training too. Also a concern is that they nurses have to perform a certain quantity of screens to keep their certificate, from memory I think it was at least 50 test per year, and the colposcopy staff have to have a certain amount too. So the numbers of women needed to practise on is huge as there are so many smear takers & colposcopists.

        https://www.bsccp.org.uk/healthcare-professionals/colposcopy-training/trainer-trainee-guidelines/ COPIED & PASTED BELOW FOR COLPOSCOPISTS & MY WORDS IN CAPITALS:
        “As a minimum standard the BSCCP/RCOG colposcopy training programme needs to produce sufficient colposcopists to maintain the status quo. There are currently approximately 2000 practising colposcopists in the UK, most of whom are BSCCP certificated.” THATS 2000 OF THEM IN THE UK….ALL MUTLILATING WOMEN TO MAINTAIN THE STATUS QUO! IN THIS SITE I CAN SEE 150 COLPOSCPIES EACH ARE REQUIRED FOR THEIR TRAINING!
        “If the professional life span of a trained colposcopist is 30 years, then the programme needs to produce 65 trained colposcopists a year. In fact, possibly only a quarter of trainees will complete training or continue to practice colposcopy in the UK so the training programme will need to enrol approximately 260 colposcopist trainees annually if the status quo is to be maintained.” THEY NEED TO TRAIN 65 NEW COLPOSCOPISTS PER YEAR BUT 260 TAKE THE TRAINING, 260×150=39,000 COLPOSCOPIES!
        There is so much to read on this site but really worth a good look although I stuck to the Health Professionals & Education parts mostly, for now anyway. They have got an image gallery too of the cervix which are real pictures of these poor women. Imagine having photos of your vagina & cervix on file for all to see………..horrifying! Unbelievable the amount of wasted money on this crap!
        I just saw this video for the first time on the same site:
        BSCCP debate: Cervical cancer screening audit disclosure is of no benefit to patients
        In this video, issues regarding the benefits and possible harms associated with cervical cancer audit and in particular the disclosure of results to women\.
        A thought provoking debate on the process of disclosure of the results of cervical cancer screening audits.

        This really has to be the worst screening programme ever!

    • They say they send nine million letters a year, but there are fewer than 5 million ‘invited’ for testing each year. So the rest are all begging letters a.k.a. ‘reminders’.

    • No “current evidence of harm”. Surprised they said that. That’s quite an indictment of screening – and a damning one at that! Capita clearly don’t rate these tests and don’t seem too bothered by the blunder.

  61. Yet another campaign/blog & they don’t care about choices to not screen:
    •highlight the risks of cervical cancer
    •highlight the preventative benefits of the often misunderstood screening test
    •encourage women of all ages to respond to their screening invitation
    •encourage women to consider booking an appointment if they have missed previous invitations
    •aim to tackle issues of fear and embarrassment
    The campaign will address a number of barriers to screening highlighted by this research.
    These barriers include:
    •lack of knowledge about cervical cancer and the purpose of cervical screening
    •embarrassment about the test
    •fear of pain
    •fear that the test will result in a diagnosis of cancer
    •the possibility of using a home-based self sample, which is being considered in a UK National Screening Committee consultation – DOUBTFUL OF COURSE!

    Quoting women feel empowered when they screen LOL!
    I feel empowered with informed dissent!

      • It’s definitely a huge relief not going anymore, just so angry I went in the first place, down to their deceit/hounding of course……until I found all you lovely people here on FWEO and on the old blog critics site, I will be forever grateful to you all x

    • This organisation knows damn well some women simply don’t want a smear test but they will never acknowledge this fact. Instead they sight barriers that need to be ‘overcome.’ They play down the fact of ‘choice’ as much as they can.

      Sorry to go on yet again, i know i’ve become a pain over it , but they never gave me any choice. My blood boils when i think of what they got away with.

      I’m so glad younger women are thinking for themselves and doing the research. Perhaps they even find their way to a site like ours and read our experiences as well as the articles and comments.

      Young women need to be ‘firm’ with these people who wont take ‘no’ for an answer.

      Also apparently the over 50’s which for some reason they want to target. Me thinks the over 50’s are more likely to be ‘dissenters’ like me. If i get some unwanted text i will not be happy.

    • I am so angry about reading this. It was bad enough thinking we’ve got to sit through Ms Goody appearing across the media again next March with the anniversary bio pic, but it looks as though they’re planning a number of things. I see they are only going to talk about the benefits and no mention of choice at all. I posted recently on PHE’s screening blog, but the posts don’t even appear to wait in moderation anymore. They reply weeks later privately using your email address. I think it took them aback that some of us contributed so forcefully last year, and they don’t want a repeat of that. Ditto the Daily Fail.

      • I wonder what it is they’ve got planned.

        What concerns me is that as the attendance levels are increasingly approaching the threshold levels, they are reverting back to coercive tactics. I’m apprehensive that we might get a repeat of the 80s where informed consent didn’t even exist (not for women anyway), and you’d have been laughed at for even mentioning it. The tone of these awareness campaigns suggests that they are becoming more militant. I expect a big push next year to get those figures back up. The only shining light here is that younger women in particular, don’t appear to be taking any notice.

        Does anyone know if cervical screening is still referred to as a choice in the leaflets?

      • https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cervical-screening-description-in-brief
        The latest leaflets are here. It does say it’s up to you, and since May this year, they’ve added the link to opt out on the very last line of the leaflet under Any Questions. I did read somewhere that they’ll be used when old stocks are exhausted so goodness knows when that will be. However the summons letter itself also says it’s your choice. A lot of women tweet their summons letter on twitter, so you can see what women are being sent. A good place to follow what’s going on and some lively discussions on screening on there at the moment!

      • AQ, I got a summons a few weeks back and both the letter and the sales brochure mention that it’s our choice. Or course it’s never really a choice if the screening Nazis have decided that compliance with orders is the only ‘valid’ choice.

        Well, I’m sure they’re panicking over the possibility of their wonderful program crumbling due to loss of bums on seats, and I wonder if the recent issues with the screening programmes have had an impact on their thinking too? We’ve had the case in Ireland, and the recent cock-ups with the breast/cervical screening invites – although we all know, of course, those were not the disasters they were made out to be. So perhaps part of this awareness frenzy is a response to the damage done by those shocking (not really) failures with the system. Perhaps they think some women have lost faith in the system now they’re aware that their lady parts are in the hands of companies like Crapita and not the super-trustworthy NHS (lol).

        I’ve noticed over the past few weeks that Jo’s Tosh seems to be – on the surface, of course – changing tactics. We all know that this awful ‘charity’ has been using the dirtiest tactics to browbeat young women into testing, yet a few days ago a friend of mine pointed out a tweet from Robert Music, who was complaining about an article being insulting to non-screeners. I skimmed this article, it’s the usual ’embarrassed, unaware’ crap that we’ve seen a thousand times before. The only difference is that there’s no comment from Music, the guy’s usually all over these articles like a rash. I said to my buddy that maybe he’s complaining about this article, which is no different to all the others he’s endorsed, because he’s offended that that they didn’t approach him so he could advertise his business – sorry, charity?
        Also, a London radio station gave a little airtime to a rep from Jo’s recently, and while I shut most of it out (bad for my blood pressure if I don’t), she was waffling on about some women who may have difficulties with testing due to psycho-sexual issues.

        Odd, isn’t it. They’ve been calling us all the names under the sun for years, but now they’re pretending to care about our feelings? I’d like to think that the numbers of women who’ve found the courage to fight back against this abuse has grown, and the message has finally got through to these fanatics that a lot of women despise their precious test. However, I’m more inclined to think it’s just a new battle strategy now that the programme’s in danger – if you can’t bully them into submission, treat them with kindness instead of cruelty.

      • Yes Ada, Twitter is on fire at the moment! The CEO (or similar) from the Eve Appeal has just jumped on one of our threads and said we shouldn’t be having a conversation on the downsides of screening in public!

        The pro screening zealots and charities do seem rattled.

      • Caroline, I’ve had my eye on that thread. Funny how, when you challenge their beliefs, the pro-screeners always demand proof of your claims but have nothing to offer themselves? They just expect people to believe what they’re told, it’s almost like an organised religion, with them leading the flock. And we are the wolves trying to creep in trying to lead the sheep astray.
        These people, whether they are the brainwashed sheep or their self-serving leaders who need ‘survivors’ to support their cause, start an argument hoping to make us look foolish in front of their followers, yet in the end they only succeed in making themselves look foolish. Good.

      • Has anyone pointed out to this Eve’s Trust woman that we are not in North Korea (ladt time I checked 🤔).
        In a democracy, no topic is off limits for discussion including their beloved screening programme.
        This is a sign of desperation though… and I love it! And the more desperate they become, the more irrational and bonkers they’ll seem.

      • You know what, it’s occurred to me that whenever we have dealings with these plonkers, whether it be heated exchanges on Twitter, PHE or the Daily Fail, we should be aiming to make them look stupid and irrational.
        This is the tack they’ve used for decades to attack us. They’ve also used the old female stereotype of hysteria to make their point, which is thoroughly reprehensible.

        Well, I say fight fire with fire. These people are getting ever more desperate and their arguments ever more ridiculous.

        An idiot challenging informed choice proponents should be asked, what problem they have with a full and informed discussion of screening in the 21st century? Is it not sensible that a discussion takes place as the resultant treatment for “abnormal cells” is not insignificant. We would challenge any other procedure without condemnation, why does cervical screening in a modern democracy get a free pass? Is it not ignorant NOT to do so?

        These cretins need to be shown up for the idiots they really are.

    • Finding this website and reading the advice from you all, and following the links you helpfully provide has empowered me. I’m almost to the finish line of getting my name removed from the screening database, just awaiting confirmation back from screening authority. I couldn’t have done it without you. Thanks ladies!

    • I have also read the PHE Screening Blog and I’ve tried to put a comment on it but when I start typing it out it ends up be a very angry one and I know it won’t end up going on, I have tried to tone it down but every time I go on that site my blood start to boil.

  62. Linda you go on as much as you wish…we’re all here to listen! You are right that they will never acknowledge dissent as informed.
    And here is another from the BBC – this infuriates me! Other women should not be sharing their test experience….its private, what is wrong with these women! Attention seeking too I guess.
    A photo shared by Rebekah Vardy as she waited to undergo a smear test has prompted many women to book their own screenings, a charity has said.
    And all those women totally “uninformed” who were reminded to attend there smears.
    Using her fame and her influence just like all the other twats out there that think they have a right to get involved with other’s screening! OH look Jade Goody gets a mention yet again!

    If I get a text then I shall be calling them with a complaint along with an attitude, I don’t want texts regarding my vagina thank you very much!

    • I don’t think for one moment women were encouraged to book a test based on Ms Vardy getting her bits out. Where is the evidence?

  63. They dabbled on the edge, didn’t they?
    They were even bold enough to use the words, “it’s your choice” in one of the UK brochures, but what happened, lots of women exercised that choice, no, thanks!
    So now it’s back to damage control, wheel out the old tactics, continue to treat women like public property to be used, exploited and harmed as they see fit.
    The program is too expensive, it needs high numbers to justify the vast expense, it doesn’t work with choice.. and too many rely on the income from consults, unnecessary biopsies etc.
    It will take a lot to let this cash cow go, but I view this program a bit like a fish in a pond being drained, eventually nothing will work…when numbers fall below a certain level, they’ll be forced to make changes.
    They can do as they like, give us your worst…it simply doesn’t work on informed women, they just sound like increasingly desperate and pathetic liars.

  64. Did anyone notice a couple of articles posted in the Daily Mail about Robert Music bleating on that a record 5 million women had now failed to show up for their screenings (naughty naughty, lol) over the last few days?

    I noticed a few familiar names. I now post under the pseudonym of JeweloftheIsle.

    What the b***ers did was initially ensure that all the comments were moderated then they took off the filters. By the time my post was published, a few pro-screening posts had been up for some time with lots of suspiciously upvoted green arrows.

    The tone in green arrows soon changed though, with a few women asking about the Delphi Screener. I love challenging these people lol. They are so fanatical about screening, it’s bizarre.

    What I notice is that when I present a lot of evidence to a gobby screening fascist, they quieten down.
    I challenged at least three nurses and pointed out the overtreatment rates, test inaccuracies, informed consent and why the NHS was refusing to roll-out the self-test nationally. I also pointed out their lack of knowledge. No response. But then again, as they couldn’t refute any of ny claims, I suppose that they didn’t have an answer for me.

  65. Hi everyone – what a great website here. What a relief to see that I am not the only person who is against these types of medical procedures. Thanks to you all for putting this information out there.

    Apocalyptic Queen, I saw your comments on the Daily Mail website challenging all the pro screening posts. Well done for that!! I am very against cancer screening for myself and have never had a smear test. I hate the way it is rammed down our throats and we are made out to be ‘silly girls’ for not screening. I have my own personal reasons for not going and I never will go. Nothing anyone says will scare me into going.

    That Daily Mail site had quite a number of articles about smear tests this week. Most of the comments were from pro screeners and berating those who don’t screen. Some of them are quite venomous. It’s like they can’t stand that anyone isn’t putting themselves through what they are putting themselves through.

    Like someone mentioned on this site, it’s like there is a conspiracy to collate a database of vaginas. I am certain there is another reason for the pressure on women to screen for an uncommon illness than purely for the good of our health. There are plenty of more common cancers that no-one is bothered about screening for, yet it’s always the ones that involve women’s intimate areas that are pushed on us.

    I believe that the origins of this test were rooted in perversion and they are still to this day driven by perversion. Even the photos that accompany articles about it show women spread-eagled, and things about breast screening show young women in the mammogram machine and young women’s bodies topless with their hands strategically placed to cover them but still leave enough on show, which is not even accurate considering it is older women summoned for screening. It is sexualising medical tests and it’s all wrong.

    It’s portrayed as though the only choices are screening, or death from cervical cancer. Never is there a mention that it’s an uncommon illness and the vast majority of women will never be troubled by it. They’ve got thousands and thousands of women thinking they are ‘survivors’ when they would never have developed the illness in the first place!

    • This is a wonderful website and a great escape from the oppressive world of cancer screening. I’m only sorry I didn’t discover it sooner, as I had largely avoided the medical profession until a serious illness a few years ago. It was Elizabeth who told me about this site. Eternally grateful for everyone on this site. So much useful information. I’m very interested in the history of this testing and how it came about and like you I believe it has its roots in male control. The sexualised images for it are everywhere. Note that in the UK we have a lot of glamourous models promoting their smear test in glorious colour, so keen to give tantalising views of their open thighs on the couch, and yet they claim a lot of women don’t go because they are ashamed of their less than perfect bodies. Whole business is so vile.

    • Haha yes!! I think Jo’s Tosh must dread seeing my pseudonym appear everytime there’s an article about cervical screening! 😂😂
      I’m quite persistent about challenging all the nonsense the pro-screeners come up with. Quite often, I’ll bombard them with evidence and questions to such an extent that they stop replying to me! They rarely have an answer for me once I present them with evidence (as opposed to insults!).

      I’m so glad there are people out there like you who read my posts and take some degree of knowledge and comfort from them.

      Yes, these women are quite vitriolic aren’t they?! It always puzzles me how they can be so invested with someone else’s business, but it makes challenging them all the more fun!

      We’ve been silenced by these people for far too long and quite frankly, it’s more than time for them to be put in their places!

      It isn’t about telling them not to screen after all, it’s about giving them all the information to enable them to make an informed choice.

      I still post on there but under a different pseudonym.

Speak your mind

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.